Every Regulation Points to Your Salesforce Org.

GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, and your auditors require the same three things: data minimization, retention policies, and privacy rights. Cloud Compliance automates all three, 100% natively.

โœ“ 100% Native AppExchange Packageโœ“ AppExchange Security Review Certifiedโœ“ 3-Week Go-Live

Trusted by leading enterprises

Deloitte
PayPal
iRobot
Stellantis
Floor & Decor
ClearChoice
Education First
Resolution Life
Saint Louis University
Elpedison
CloudKitchens
Cognity
Deloitte
PayPal
iRobot
Stellantis
Floor & Decor
ClearChoice
Education First
Resolution Life
Saint Louis University
Elpedison
CloudKitchens
Cognity

The mandate your auditors already have.

60%

Of organizations experienced a non-production data breach (Perforce State of Data Compliance, 2025)

Your sandbox has your customers' real data in it right now

Your last sandbox refresh pulled the full Contact database: names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, health records. Your development team and offshore contractors have full query access. IT flagged it as standard procedure. GDPR does not have an exception for test environments.

"When we copy the data into full copy Sandbox, any developer who can get access, they can see everything, all the PII data."

- Enterprise Architect, US based Credit Union

$1,524

Average cost of manually processing a single DSAR (Captain Compliance, 2024)

One deletion request. Six hours. Across how many objects?

A customer emails "delete my data." Your privacy team opens Salesforce. There is no button. They start at Contacts. Then Cases. Then Contracts. Then Opportunities. Then Marketing Cloud. Each step is manual search, review, and deletion. Get a cascade wrong and you destroy related records. The 30-day GDPR clock started 10 days ago.

"We have a manual process for data deletion and is quite laborious."

- IT Product Owner, Swiss Construction Enterprise

4%

Of global annual revenue: maximum GDPR Article 83 penalty

Every expired record in your org is documented liability waiting to be found

You have retention policies. They are in a spreadsheet. Your org has Contact records from 2017, closed-lost deals from 2018, support cases from 2016. GDPR Article 5 requires data minimization. Your own database is evidence it is not happening. When an auditor subpoenas your Salesforce data, they do not need to look far.

"Taking data out is always something that can be quite anxious about. As a former DBA I know."

- Enterprise Architect, European Insurance Company

So you look for a solution. That's when the real problem starts.

Salesforce Shield encrypts at rest. Authorized users still see everything through the UI, SOQL, and reports, whether Shield is on or not. Third-party tools process your data on someone else's server, creating new GDPR Article 28 obligations. Custom Apex compliance work takes months, requires ongoing maintenance, and still hits governor limits.

Three compliance gaps in every Salesforce org. Including yours.

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Sandbox DataMasker

Developers testing against production PII

  • โœ“Field-level format-preserving masking
  • โœ“Email suppression prevents delivery to real customers
  • โœ“REST API for Copado, Gearset, and GitLab pipelines
  • โœ“Contractors in sandboxes in hours, not weeks
Learn more โ†’
๐Ÿ—„๏ธ

Data Retention

Stale data is documented liability

  • โœ“Policy-based deletion and archiving
  • โœ“Cascade logic across related objects
  • โœ“70% storage reduction typical
  • โœ“Respects Master-Detail relationships
Learn more โ†’
โš–๏ธ

Privacy Rights Automation

DSARs at scale across all objects

  • โœ“1-click DSAR fulfillment
  • โœ“30-day SLA compliance built-in
  • โœ“Full audit trail for every request
  • โœ“Covers Sales, Service, and Marketing Cloud
Learn more โ†’
99M+

Records masked in 24 hours

5M/hr

Masking throughput

3 weeks

Typical go-live

Agentforce Compliance

Sandbox data for Agentforce: a two-sided compliance trap.

When developers build and test Agentforce agents in sandboxes, they work against sandbox data. If that sandbox is a copy of production, which it usually is after a refresh, the LLM reads live customer records: names, dates of birth, financial history. Every test run, every prompt cycle, processes real PII in an environment your entire dev team can access.

The instinctive fix is masking. But naive field substitution changes semantic meaning. Replace a date of birth so a minor becomes an adult, and the agent draws a different compliance inference. Mask an income range into the wrong tier, and a loan recommendation produces invalid results. Your test environment no longer reflects production behavior.

DataMasker uses semantic masking. Names become different but plausible names. Dates shift within the same age bracket. Amounts substitute within the same value tier. The agent trains on data that is structurally and contextually identical to real data, without containing real data.

See how CC supports Agentforce โ†’

The semantic masking difference:

What changes, and what must stay the same for AI inferences to hold.

  • โœ“Production PII removed from sandbox, no real customer data in dev environments
  • โœ“Age brackets preserved, a minor masked as a minor, not randomly as an adult
  • โœ“Value tiers maintained, income ranges, scores, and amounts substitute within the same band
  • โœ“Format fidelity, names look like names, emails like emails, dates behave like dates
  • โœ—Naive field replacement changes inference context, and produces unreliable AI results

Your data never leaves Salesforce.

Every compliance tool that moves data outside Salesforce creates a new attack surface. Cloud Compliance is a managed package. APIs written in Apex, hosted in your org, governed by your Salesforce permissions. No outbound calls. No data copies. No middleware.

No Data Export

All processing happens inside your Salesforce org. No external endpoints. No data movement.

No Middleware

Native Apex managed package: no integration layer, no additional servers to secure.

Governor-Limit Safe

Built for Salesforce's execution constraints. Batch processing respects all platform limits.

AppExchange Certified

Every release passes Salesforce AppExchange Security Review: not a badge, a gate.

โ†’
vs. Salesforce Shield: Shield encrypts at rest. Authorized users still see everything through the UI, SOQL, and reports. DataMasker masks the actual field values before developers access the environment. They cover different risks - most orgs need both. Full comparison โ†’
โ†’
vs. off-platform tools: Third-party compliance tools that extract data from Salesforce create new GDPR Article 28 obligations. Cloud Compliance processes everything within your org boundary.
โ†’
Enterprise pricing: At enterprise scale, some privacy compliance alternatives can exceed $300,000. Cloud Compliance caps in the five figures, with faster deployment and broader object coverage.
โ†’
107 regression tests per release: 240 hours of testing minimum. The AppExchange Security Review is not a badge. It is a gate that every release must pass before it reaches your org.

Every regulation your Salesforce org faces.

New regulation? We ship coverage before the enforcement deadline.

Frequently Asked Questions

See Cloud Compliance in Action

Book a 30-minute demo on your own Salesforce sandbox. We'll show you exactly how masking, retention, or privacy rights work for your compliance requirement. Your data never leaves your environment.